Monday, December 6, 2010

Free response practice #1

"Why are the trials and tribulations of Galileo often considered both predicative of the future of Western Civilization as well as a perfect encapsulation of the context of his own time?"

Galileo Galilei was a respected Italian scientist of his time. He had many great discoveries and inventions that would go on to shape civilization even after his death. Some of these discoveries were controversial, especially with the Church. His discoveries went against the word in the Bible and he was accused of heresy. His discovery that the sun was the center of the universe and everything revolved around it was especially controversial with biblical teachings at the time. His trials and tribulations gave way to advances in modern science and also showed that at his time religion and science conflicted greatly.

During Galileo’s time, religion was a major discussion topic. It had caused many controversies in the past, some including scientific discoveries others not. In the Bible it says that the Earth never moves, and with Galileo saying it revolved around the sun, the Church was offended. He was taken from his home while he was sick, forced to go to trial, accused of heresy, and put on house arrest. He was not able to leave his house at all, even though all he did was make a great discovery. This exemplifies how serious of a crime this was at the time because religion was at a state where it was an unstable controversy. If this discovery had been made in a time of religious stability, it may have received the credit it deserved at the time.

His discovery opened new doors in science that people had never thought could be opened. His discovery put science in a whole new light and opened numerous possibilities for new research. At the time of his discovery, religion was more renowned and thought about then science. His discovery had to be covered up by the Church because if his discovery was right, it would take away from the literal credibility of the Bible. Galilei said that two truths should not be contradicted. His discovery was indeed right, and he did not make this discovery as an attack on the church, rather to give information to the people. If his discovery had not contradicted Church teachings, the Church would have been fine with his discovery, even glorified it. The Church was not punishing him for the discovery itself, but for the way it affected Church teachings.

This discovery helped fellow scientists shift into a new type of science that has lead to the abilities we have today. Without his discovery being voiced, we would be not as updated in things like astrology and space travel. If he had feared voicing his opinion because he knew the Church would be upset, we would never have heard of his name. He took the courage to voice what he had found, right or wrong, and the risk he took greatly affected modern life for the better. It still shows that his time was in primitive stages of scientific discovery in certain areas that we still do not totally understand. His time was more about religion than it was about anything else.

Galileo is a hero for his discovery in the science department. His trials and tribulations have made the people of the world more advanced and intelligent. Western civilization had created inventions that would not be able to be thoughts without Galileo. Religion is not a dominant as it was in his time. People during his time were forced to agree with Church teachings or they would be punished. Now, science is a major study and competitive industry in the modern world to find more great discoveries like Galileo’s controversial discovery. Discoveries today are still controversial, but not as often with religion. The times have greatly changed since Galileo’s time and advance in all fields can be slightly contributed to his courage and intelligence. His trials and tribulations changed today’s world for the better.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Score for Quiz

42/50

Quiz 11/23/10

48. Prince
49. Christopher Columbus
50. The Columbus Exchange
51. Silk
52.
53. Joint stock company
54. Protestant
55. True
56.
57.
58. No
59.
60. Middle class
61. House of Lords
62. Puritans
63. Stuarts
64. Presbyterian
65. 1603-1625
66. Divine right of kings
67. Catholics
68. Edict of worms
69. Oliver Cromwell
70. Scotland
71.
72. Round-heads
73.
74. Republic
75.
76.
77.James II
78.
79.
80.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Quiz 11/22/10

1. Martin Luther
2. 95 Thesis
3. Hapsburg
4. The Basilica
5. Freeby
6. Faith alone
7. The Bible
8. He was against the Pope.
9. The ruling class
10. False
11. German peasantry
12. Calvinism
13. Puritans
14. Peace of Augsburg
15. He went against the Catholic Church by saying that faith alone is enough for salvation.
16. He did not believe in a hierarchy.
17. John Calvin
18. Augsburg
19. Freeby
20. Hugonogts
21. Henry VIII
22. Elizabeth I
23. Puritans
24. Pope Benedict
25. Council of Trent
26. False
27. Vulgate
28. Loyola
29. To spread Catholicism to more places of the world.
30. 17th
31. Giotto
32. Phillip III
33. Spanish armada
34. St. day massacre
35. Edict of Naples
36. 300
37. Peace of Augsburg
38. Protestant Union
39. Catholic league
40. Catholics
41. Protestants
42.
43. King of Sweden during 30 years war
44. Peace of
45. Area that France annexed as result of treaty 1648
46. Spain
47. France

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

DBQ Format Quiz

1. The range of scores on a DBQ is from 1 being the lowest, to 10 being the highest.
2. If the DBQ does not have a thesis statement the highest score is 9.
3. If there are 12 available documents, you must cite at least 6 in the DBQ.
4. Bias is the point of view on the topic the DBQ is asking you to explain.
5. Groupings are the way you group your information.
6. Document 5

Friday, October 29, 2010

The Prince

1. Oliverotto da Fermo would be the most successful in the modern world at running a business. In his time he was able form his own government and declare himself the prince. He did this when he “rode up and down the town and besieged the chief magistrate in the palace” (Machiavelli) causing fear in many people. These people obeyed him out of fear which was why he was able to become the prince of his government. In modern society this may not have worked as well as it did back in his time because the public would have reacted differently. The fear he caused within the people would stay the same though, which is why he would have been successful in the mafia. In the mafia force, fear, and power are important and Oliverotto would be able to take advantage of these three things. He rode on horseback and was able to get what he wanted out of anger by force. The fear was a product of this force which would follow in the majority of people because it is a natural human emotion. These two things would only increase his power in the mafia as his own allies would turn to him and strengthen his power as more forceful acts were done.

2. The prince’s greatest ally is the citizens of his ruling area. There are two types of people, commoners and the nobles. A prince who is put in power by the people is far more likely to succeed than one put in power by the nobles. The nobles would put a prince in place because they cannot control the people easily. This prince will not have the people on his side because he was put in place to oppress them. Also, the nobles will be much harder to please than the common people, and they will be more dishonest as they try to gain power for themselves. If a prince is put in power by the people, he has a better chance of staying in power. The people will go along with his decisions better and be easier to please. They will be easy to please because they will feel more important than they would to a prince who was elected by the nobles, even if he were to treat them well. “A prince created by the people must retain the people’s friendship, a fairly easy task. A prince created by the nobles must still try to win over the people’s affection” (Machiavelli). This shows that a prince who has been allied by the people and chosen will have an easy road than one who has not been.

3. Machiavelli thinks that generosity is a good thing in some situations, but in others it can hurt the prince. A prince who tries to be to generous can end up losing some of his power. Machiavelli explains that for a prince to be generous he fist has to be selfish. A prince who wants to give money to the poorest people would first have to raise taxes to obtain the money. This would cause bad reactions because of the high taxes so generosity would not be a good thing in that situation. A prince who is known for his generosity is a bad prince according to Machiavelli because he will deplete all of his recourses (Machiavelli). On the other hand, a prince who is at first frugal with his money and recourses, will be able to become known as generous as he can use his saved money to help the poor, without taxing them unjustly. Machiavelli basically believes that generosity can lead to the downfall of a prince, is self-defeating, and will eventually lead to hatred of the prince over time.

4. Machiavelli’s book tells a prince how to be a successful ruler by being forceful and brutal. The Beatitudes are the word of God and disagree completely with Machiavelli. “Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.(Matthew 5:5 New International Version). When someone is meek, they are not forceful and demanding as Machiavelli says a prince should be. A person who is meek is humble and patient, not someone who wants the upmost power and goes out and tries to gain it, as Machiavelli thinks a prince should.Blessed are the merciful for they will be shown mercy. (Matthew 5:7 New International Version). The Beatitudes stated that those who are merciful and care for the well being of others will be shown mercy back. Machiavelli says that a prince may never be merciful because his enemies will take advantage of him, but God wants people to love their enemies as their neighbors and they will receive the greatest gift, a spot in Heaven. While Machiavelli thinks that a perfect prince must be a power fiend, hungering for more and more power, destroying his enemies, listing to the Beatitudes is what is necessary. The Beatitudes are Gods words written down and if they are followed, then the prince will have eternal happiness in the Kingdom of God. If he is to follow Machiavelli, all of what he worked for and got unjustly will be taken when his mortal life is ended.

5. The Beatitudes want people to follow God’s word and strive to be perfect. As only God himself can be perfect, Machiavelli focuses on other things. Machiavelli wants the prince to strive to be as powerful as he can be, not as holy as he can be. By doing this the prince will be the best he can be, which is the main goal for a prince in his life time. The Beatitudes say “blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:3 New International Version) but Machiavelli’s wants the prince to focus on his royal kingdom. If a prince does this he will be a better ruler than one who listens to the Beatitudes because a prince who listens to them will be a weak ruler. “I say, therefore, that the arms with which a prince defends his state are either his own, or they are mercenaries, auxiliaries, or mixed.” (Machiavelli). Here he is saying that the prince only needs himself and his allies, not God to be successful in what his job is. His job is to be a good ruler, not a religious man patiently waiting for a Kingdom he will never rule. The early birds gets the worm and a go getter type of prince that Machiavelli tells princes to be is the best king of prince that there possibly is.

Machiavelli, N. (1532). The Prince. Florence: Antonio Blado d'Asola. .

Monday, October 4, 2010

Henry Tudor

Henry VIII was justified in making himself the head of the English Church. He separated from the Catholic Church and created the Church of England; therefore he should be the head. Henry was not justified in divorcing Catherine for the reason she could not give him a son. There was no legitimate reason for him to be able to divorcer her because it is the male who determines the sex of a child born to them. Therefore, Henry was justified only in making himself the head of his own church, but not in divorcing his wife.

The pope would not grant an annulment for Henry and his wife, upsetting Henry. Henry had to marriage annulled by one of his men, Thomas Cranmer, instead of the pope. He was excommunicated from the Catholic Church and created the Church of England. He was the King so therefore making himself the head of the Church was justified. He was an all powerful ruler who had supremacy over his subjects, making his decision to become head of the church a justified decision.

Henry had six wives in his time of reign. Catherine his first wife was unable to give him a male heir to the throne. He set his sights on Anne Boleyn, a younger women who he had hopes would give him a son. He obviously had committed adultery because by the time his marriage to Catherine was annulled, Anne was noticeably pregnant. This makes his decision unjustified and unmoral because he cheated on his wife, and had no legitimate reason of why she should no longer be his wife.

Henry was not able to produce a male heir with Catherine and knew that he needed one to keep the Tudor name in power. The only way he figured to get a male heir was to divorcer her and try with a new wife. He did not have her murder but had her sent away after the marriage was annulled so he could marry Anne, who also was unable to give him a male heir. The Church of England was a protestant church and England became protestant during his reign. He wanted his heir to be able to keep England protestant.

Henry was unjustified in divorcing his wife because she did not do anything of treason or adultery. He was justified in making himself the head of the church after being excommunicated from the Catholic Church. Henry was able to finally have a male heir but he died while he was the King when he was twelve years old. Henry was not able to be justified in divorcing his wife which is why the pope would not annul the marriage and had him excommunicated. He was still justified after he was already excommunicated from the other church so that was a justifiable action.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Thomas Wolsey


Thomas Wolsey was born in the years between 1471- or 1475 and died on 29 November 1530. He was an English political figure and cardinal of the Roman Catholic church. Thomas' main legacy is from his interest in architecture in particular his old home of Hampton Court palace which still stands today. He became an archbishop of York and held the second most important seat in England. He started send letters to princes and orators in Rome reproaching the king. After a year, the king finally had enough and order the cardinal to be arrested. The King then order Sir William Kingston Knight to bring the cardinal to the Abby of Leicester. Here, Thomas Wolsey was weak and ill and subsequently died on the second night there.

Anne Boleyn


It is unknown when exactly Anne Boleyn was born, but now most historians agree that it was in 1499. Anne spent her childhood in France, and returned to England in 1521. She was not a ravishing beauty, even with her long dark hair and dark brown eyes that looked almost black. However, she used her looks to her advantage, and even got the king to notice her. She refused to be his mistress—she would only settle for being his wife. However, Henry VIII was married to Katherine of Aragon at the time, and the Church refused to let him divorce her. However, Henry broke from the Church, and they were married in 1533. Sadly, Anne was unable to bear a son, and Henry, growing impatient, found another mistress. Anne was then charges with incest, treason, and adultery, locked in the Tower, and finally executed.
Some Primary Sources

Catherine of Aragon


Catherine of Aragon was born on December 16, 1485 and died on January 7, 1536. She was the first wife of Henry VIII. First she was married to Prince Arthur but he died within a few months of major and so she married his brother, King Henry. Henry and Catherine had a daughter together, Mary. Henry divorced her so he could marry Anne Boleyn. When Henry divorced Catherine she was banished from the court. She was forced to live in small castles and had very few servants. She died three weeks after her fiftieth birthday.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Part 3: Poems

Richard III

I was brother to Edward IV,[1]

It was not him who split from the Church for a divorce,

When Edward died I became guardian of Edward’s sons,

I had them both locked away in the tower[2] which is no fun.

I was crowned in 1483[3] instead of Edward V heir to the throne,

Because into the tower he was thrown[4].

I refused gifts of cash, preferring the people’s goodwill [5]

I hoped with the people this would go over well.

In the year 1484 I reestablished Council of the North which lasted for a century and a half,

I established the College of Arms which had not been established in the past [6]

In 18 months I lost his brother, son, and wife [7]

This put my heart through great strife.

I was the last member of the House of York to be a King,

I was killed by Henry Tudor and his army in summer[8] not spring.

My reign lasted for 2 years until 1485[9]

When I was slain before he had time to cry.

I was only 32 when I was killed in war[10]

But it was my time and death knocked at the door.

Henry Tudor became King and ended to Plantagenet reign[11]

Things in England would never be the same

[1]http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[2] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[3] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[4] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[5] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[6] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[7] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[8]http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[9] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[10] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

[11] http://www.richard111.com/Biography%20on%20King%20Richard%20III.htm

Henry Tudor

Born on 28 January 1457 was I[1]

My name is Henry VII

I was the first King in the Tudor dynasty[2]

I took reign after Richard III was killed in battle

Because I declared myself King[3]

His death ended the War of the Roses

At the battle of Bosworth Field

I married Elizabeth of York[4]

I spent most of my life in exile [5]

Until the battle that changed my life

The house of York had lost power

When I can to power

The house of Lancaster had been long gone

And the Tudor’s had all the power.

I increased our government’s effectiveness[6]

I restored the power

Over English nobility[7]

But things got tough in later years of my reign

When my wife died

I was saddened so deeply

I died myself in 1509[8]My 18 year old son was my successor when I passed

My reign lasting 24 years

From 1458 to 1509[9]

I tried what I could to help my people

My time as King may have ended

But the Tudor reign would continue

For years to come



Part 2: Richard III: Fact and Fiction

Why did Shakespeare portray Richard III the way he did? He portrayed Richard III the way he did because in his play he was the villain. Richard is thought that he may have murdered his two nephews in the tower and Shakespeare went with the evil portrayal of Richard.
Traditionalist- Conservative views. Looks at things the traditional way.
Revisionist-
Lancatrian- Supporting the House of Lancaster.
Ricardian- People wanting to restore the view people have on Richard III.


Thursday, September 23, 2010

Part 1: The Rulers

Henry V- Born: Sept. 1387 at Monmouth , England
Died: 21 Aug 1422 at Bois de Vincennes , France
Years Ruled: 1413 - 1422
Crowned at age 26, spent reign campaigning in France. Battle of Agincourt fought October 25, 1415 during Hundred Years War. House of Lancaster.

Henry VI- Born:1421
Died: 21 May 1471 at London , England
Years Ruled:1422 - 1461 & 1470 - 1471
Crowned King of England France as an infant. Lost all French territory except Calais. At age 32 he suffered mental illness attack and Richard, duke of York took throne. captured by Yorkshire forces and was forced to admit Richard was heir to the thrown. Lost crown to Richard's son Edward IV in 1461. House of Lancaster

Edward IV- Born: 11 Feb 1442 at Rouen, France
Died: 9 Apr 1483 at London, England
Years Ruled:1461 - 1470 & 1471 - 1483
Achieved goal of putting York family member at throne. Defeated the Lancastrians at Mortimor's Cross and was proclaimed king in March 1461. House of York

Henry VI- Born:1421
Died: 21 May 1471 at London , England
Years Ruled:1422 - 1461 & 1470 - 1471
Briefly came back to throne in 1470 but was captured and murdered in 1471. House of Lancaster.

Edward IV- Born: 11 Feb 1442 at Rouen, France
Died: 9 Apr 1483 at London, England
Years Ruled:1461 - 1470 & 1471 - 1483
Fled to Holland 1470. Returned 1471 and won battle of Teweksburg. Took back throne in 1471 when Henry VI was murdered. House of York

Edward V- Born: 1470
Died: 1483 at London, England
Years Ruled: 1483
Was 12 when his father died. He was heir to throne. Richard III had him locked in Tower of London and was murdered. House of York

Richard III- Born: 2 Oct 1452 at Fotheringhay Castle, Northamptonshire, England
Died : 22 Aug 1485 at Bosworth, Leicestershire, England
Years Ruled: 1483 - 1485
Younger brother of Edward IV. Edward died leaving his sons in care of Richard III. Had them imprisoned and killed. Took throne 1483 was murdered by Henry VII in Battle of Bosworth Field. House of York.

Henry VII- Born: 28 Jan 1457 at Pembroke Castle, Wales
Died: 21 Apr 1509 at Richmond Palace, England
Years Ruled: 1485 - 1509
First ruler in Tudor line. Defeated Yorkish attempts to retake thrown. Built Richmond Place and rebuilt the Chapel in Westminster Abbey.

"Wars of the Roses: Summary for King Henry V." WarsOfTheRoses.com - Wars of the Roses. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. .
"Wars of the Roses: Summary for King Henry VI." WarsOfTheRoses.com - Wars of the Roses. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. .
"Wars of the Roses: Summary for King Edward IV." WarsOfTheRoses.com - Wars of the Roses. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. .
"Wars of the Roses: Summary for King Edward V." WarsOfTheRoses.com - Wars of the Roses. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. .
"Wars of the Roses: Summary for King Richard III." WarsOfTheRoses.com - Wars of the Roses. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. .
"Wars of the Roses: Summary for King Henry VII." WarsOfTheRoses.com - Wars of the Roses. Web. 23 Sept. 2010. .